Today we are going to compare two most popular CMS websites WordPress and Joomla! You will ask what CMS means. The answer is CMS stands for content management systems that allow applying any changes to the site without touching code. Before comparing these two softwares, we will take a closer look to each of them separately.
WordPress is one of the most famous CM systems. Today it is powering more than 60 million sites all over the world and is used on over than 40% of the websites based on CMS. WordPress is a free open-source software powered by such programming languages as PHP, HTML, CSS, etc. It has multiple plugins, widgets, and themes which make wp fully customizable and expandable. WordPress software is perfect for small (blogs) and medium websites and does not require any technical skills. This is the reason wp is recommended for beginners. To update add-ons and publish content have become easy as one two three, along with that the security corresponds to regulations. You will be pleased to know that WordPress powers Walt Disney Co., the LinkedIn blog, and BBC America's multisite. Despite the advantages wp has, there are still some shortcomings we should say about: since WordPress is easy to use, it limits the ability to make significant visual adjustments. You will have to hire a designer or developer who will help you to update web page structure.
Joomla! is the second widely used website after WordPress. It does not require a high level of technical experience like Drupal software does (the 3d most popular content management system which is good for people with well-developed technical skills). Joomla! has a variety of themes and plugins (near 6000), and powers applications of all types, from blog to corporate intranet. It is based on PHP and MySQL. You will have no hassle to update the website corresponding to your needs. Joomla! is perfect for eCommerce sites; it runs better than any other CMS options. Whether you need to make your web page more functional, feel free to go ahead with Joomla! extensions database, there are thousands of them, and many are free. The extensions are represented in different options: plugins, languages, files and packages, modules which have the same features as widgets in WordPress. Joomla! is found to be powerful and flexible yet user-friendly and intuitive. These are the main things users love Joomla!
Even if we are not going to compare WordPress and Joomla! with Drupal, we have found it crucial to explore it in more detail though. As you might have already understood, Drupal requires the most technical expertise among three CM systems. It is multipurpose, and there are modules available which allow you to tune the website the way you need. You can even change the
root file directly. Based on the following user’s feedback, it becomes easier to understand what Drupal is: ‘It is enterprise-ready for the world’s busiest websites where failure is not an option. Drupal will scale with your business and your brands for your next-generation digital transformation’. Drupal is found to be the most powerful; it guarantees faster response time and multisite support. If you know programming languages well and want to apply essential changes to your website, Drupal is what you need.
We are going to compare WordPress and Joomla! based on the following parameters: usability, security, support, add-ons. Let’s start now.
Joomla! may seem more flexible than WordPress. Though, WordPress beats Joomla! when it comes to usage, support community and the variety of add-ons. Still, content management system should be chosen based on client’s purposes. If you have a site with basic interactivity like contact form and social media sharing and are not going to improve this, WordPress is right for you. For those who are going to continually adjust their website, Joomla! is a better choice. Anyway, before choosing one of the software, take a closer look at your business plan and decide for yourself if your website will need further adjustments. This will help you to make the right choice.
Roots
Roots is very good at helping to build static front-ends. It is sponsored heavily by Carrot Creative, and makes frequent, highly variable builds quicker and easier for freelancers and agencies. It's a truly excellent framework for quickly and easily building small to medium sized front-ends of any kind. Roots can handle a huge number of compiled languages, and can be used with many tools that help push static sites as far as possible. For example, it can link with an API, pull in your data, and render parts of it into your views on compile. Then it can render the same or other views as javascript templates and you can push any other data from your API into them on the fly at runtime on the client side in reaction to user actions. And that's just a small taste of its capabilities. You really can do a lot with static sites, and roots is here to push those limits.
Why is WebriQ using Roots?
The short answer is because roots was built very specifically for static site builds, so it's cleaner and better than general purpose build tools, since it's specialized to that purpose. The longer answer is that it's a qualitative thing. Much like people would ask "Why should I use snapchat when I can just text a photo" or "Why should I use slack when I already have hipchat?", there is no logical answer other than that the experience is different, and in my opinion, much better -- tailored exactly to what you need. So just try it, and you just might find that you really like it.
WebriQ CMS is bridging the GAP between Static Site Generators and Flat File CMS Systems. The days when a brand only needed one website to house its online presence are long gone. Today, webinars, events, pop-up shops and product promotions all require their own microsites or landing pages. When we moved into what some call the post-CMS landscape, the usage of static site generators and Flat-file CMS and Static Site Generator functionality overlaps in many ways ; so how do you choose between the two?
When we moved into what some call the post-CMS landscape, the usage of static site generators (SSGs) and flat-file CMS for these microsites (and at times for lightweight corporate sites), grew. And now, with the headless CMS hype in full flow, the interest in these front-end solutions is returning.
After listing the best flat-file CMS and the best static site generators on offer — it’s time to formally identify what separates these two similar technologies.
Once you signed up and have your site created on our APP you can freely integrate